Italian organisations within the European nanotechnology network: presence, dynamics and effects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12854/erde-145-21Keywords:
Geography of knowledge, EU research policy, nanotechnology, ItalyAbstract
Nanotechnology is an emerging interdisciplinary field that, according to the European Commission, represents one of the world’s new technological frontiers. Nanoscience and nanotechnology play a key role in European Union research policies; they have been included among the “seven priority thematic areas” of the Sixth Framework Programme and the “nine themes” of the Cooperation Programme of the Seventh Framework Programme. The purpose of this study is to assess the role of Italian organisations in the existing European nanotechnology innovation network and to illuminate several aspects of relational and geographical dynamics as well as the scientific and economic effects of these partnerships in Italy. Using an official document issued by the European Commission entitled “Mapping Portal for Nanotechnology Research” and adopting social network analysis techniques, statistics and qualitative interviews, it is determined that Italy plays a central role in the European nanotechnology network, that Italian organisations have tended to replicate satisfactory prior collaborations, that other factors have been more significant than geographical proximity in creating research groups and developing projects, and, finally, that scientific effects have been substantially more significant than economic effects at the national level.References
Airi Nanotec 2011a: Comunicato Stampa. Airi: micro e nanotecnologie al centro della giornata Airi per l’innovazione industriale. – Roma. – Online available at: http://www.barabino.it/upload/documenti/COS_AIRI_10.05.pdf, 03/08/2014
Airi Nanotec 2011b: Third Italian nanotechnology census. – Roma
Amin, A. 2002: Spatialities of globalisation. – Environment and Planning A 34 (3): 385-399
Asheim, B.T., P. Cooke and R. Martin (eds.) 2006: Clusters and regional development; critical reflections and explorations. – London
Autant-Bernard, C., P. Billand, D. Frachisse and N. Massard 2007: Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies. – Papers in Regional Science 86 (3): 495-519
Baker, S.E. and R. Edwards (eds.) 2012: How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. – National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. – Online Available at: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/4/how_many_interviews.pdf, 31/07/2014
Barber, M.J., A. Krueger, T. Krueger and T. Roediger-Schluga
: The network of EU-funded collaborative R&D projects. – Physical Review E 73: 036132
Binz, C. and B. Truffer 2011: Technological innovation systems
in multi-scalar space. Analyzing an emerging water recycling industry with social network analysis. – Geographica Helvetica 66 (4): 254-260
Borgatti, S.P., M.G. Everett and L.C. Freeman 2002: Ucinet
for Windows: Software for social network analysis. – Harvard, MA
Borrás, S. and D. Tsagdis 2008: Cluster policies in Europe: firms, institutions, and governance. – Cheltenham
Boschma, R. 2005: Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. – Regional Studies 39 (1): 61-74
Braczyk, H.-J., P. Cooke and M. Heidenreich (eds.) 1998: Regional innovation systems; the role of governances in a globalized world. – London
Cairncross, F. 1997: The death of distance: how the communications revolution will change our lives. – Cambridge
Caloghirou, Y., A. Tsakanikas and N.S. Vonortas 2001: University-industry cooperation in the context of the European
Framework Programmes. – The Journal of Technology Transfer 26 (1-2): 153-161
Castells, M. 1996: The rise of the network society. – Oxford et al.
Castells, M. 2004: An introduction to the information age. – In: Webster F., R. Blom, E. Karvonen, H. Melin, K. Nordenstreng and E. Puoskari (eds.): The information society reader. – London et al.: 138-149
Cooke, P., M. Gomez Uranga and G. Etxebarria 1997: Regional innovation systems: institutional and organisational dimensions. – Research Policy 26: 475-491
Cooke, P., M. Gomez Uranga and G. Etxebarria 1998: Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective. – Environment and Planning A 30 (9): 1563-1584
Corbisiero, F. 2014: Analisi delle reti sociali. – Dipartimento di Scienze Sociali, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II. – Online available at: https://www.docenti.unina.it/downloadPub.do?tipoFile=md&id=383461, 03/08/2014
Di Bello, G. 2013: Industrial competitiveness in Horizon 2020: Towards an integrated planning framework for key enabling technologies. – APRE – Agency for the Promotion of European Research. – Online available at: https://community.oecd.org/servlet/JiveServlet/preview-Body/50271-102-1-94171/Di%20Bello_Report_%20Industrial%20Leadership_H2020.pdf, 22/12/2013
Etzkowitz, H. 1997: The triple helix: academy-industry-government relations and the growth of neo-corporatist industrial policy in the U.S. – In: Campodall’Orto, S. (ed.): Managing technological knowledge transfer: Proceedings from COST A3 Workshop in Milan, Italy, February 1-2, 1996. – EC Social Sciences COST A3, Vol. 4. – Luxembourg: 1-20
Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff 2000: The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. – Research
Policy 29 (2): 109-123
Etzkowitz, H., J. Dzisah, M. Ranga and C. Zhou 2007: The triple helix model of innovation. University-industry-government interaction. – Asia Pacific Tech Monitor 24 (1): 14-23
European Commission 2007a: FP 7 in brief. How to get involved in the EU 7th Framework Programme for Research. – Luxembourg. – Online available at: http://ec.europa.eu/
research/FP 7/pdf/FP 7-inbrief_en.pdf, 22/12/2013
European Commission 2007b: Improving knowledge transfer between research institutions and industry across Europe. – Luxembourg. – Online available at: http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/knowledge_transfe_07.pdf, 22/12/2013
European Commission 2007c: FP 7 hands-on guide. – Belgium.
– Online available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/
sme-techweb/pdf/sme_handson_en.pdf, 22/12/2013
European Commission 2010: Europe 2020. – Luxembourg. – Online available at: http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/
index_en.htm, 22/12/2013
European Commission 2011: FP 7 Third country agreements. International instruments associating third countries to FP 7. – Luxembourg. – Online available at: ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/FP 7/docs/third_country_agreements_en.pdf, 22/12/2013
European Commission 2013a: Mapping portal for nanotechnology research FP 6/7 Projects. – Luxembourg. – Online available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/industrial_
technologies/pdf/ec-nanotechnology-research-mapping_
en.pdf, 22/12/2013
European Commission 2013b: Fact sheet: International Participation in Horizon 2020. – Luxembourg. – Online available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/horizon2020/pdf/press/fact_sheet_on_international_participation_in_horizon_2020.pdf, 22/12/2013
European Council 2000: Presidency conclusions, Lisbon European Council, 23 and 24 March 2000. – Online available at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/
docs/pressdata/en/ec/00100-r1.en0.htm, 22/12/2013
Fitjar, R.D. and A. Rodríguez-Pose 2011: Innovating in the
periphery: firms, values, and innovation in southwest Norway. – European Planning Studies 19 (4): 555-574
Freeman, C. 1991: Network of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. – Research Policy 20 (5): 499-514
Freeman, L.C. 1979: Centrality in social networks. Conceptual
clarification. – Social Networks 1 (3): 215-239
Frenken, K. 2000: A complexity approach to innovation networks. The case of the aircraft industry (1909-1997). – Research Policy 29 (2): 257-272
Frenken, K. 2002: A new indicator of European integration and an application to collaboration in scientific research. – Economic Systems Research 14 (4): 345-361
Frenken, K., S. Hardeman and J. Hoekman 2009: Spatial
scientometrics: towards a cumulative research program. – Journal of Informetrics 3 (3): 222-232
Georghiou, L. 1999: Socio-economic effects of collaborative R&D – European experiences. – The Journal of Technology
Transfer 24 (1): 69-79
Granovetter, M. 1985: Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. – American Journal of Sociology
(3): 481-510
Hakala, J., P. Kutinlahti and E. Kaukonen 2002: Becoming international, becoming European: EU research collaboration at Finnish universities. – Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 15 (4): 357-379
Istat 2013: Ricerca e Innovazione. – In: Istat: Bes 2013. Il
benessere equo e sostenibile in Italia. – Rome: 229-249
KMU Forschung Austria and Oxford Research 2010: Expost evaluation of NMP (FP 6) strategic level. Strategic impact, no revolution. Final Report. – Kristiansand. – Online available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/industrial_technologies/pdf/nmp-FP 6-ex-post-evaluation_en.pdf, 30/07/2014
Knoke, D. and S. Yang 2008: Social network analysis. – London
Leydesdorff, L. and H. Etzkowitz 1998: The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. – Science & Public Policy 25 (3): 195-203
Lundvall, B.-Å. (ed.) 1992: National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. – London
Maggioni, M.A. and T.E. Uberti 2011: Networks and geography in the economics of knowledge flows. – Quality and Quantity 45 (5):1031-1051
Nelson, R.R. (ed.) 1993: National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. – New York et al.
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca MIUR 2012: 7⁰ programma quadro di ricerca e sviluppo dell’unione europea. Dati della partecipazione italiana. – Rome. – Online available at: http://www.ricercainternazionale.miur.it/media/9122/settimo_programma_quadro_dati_partecipazione_italiana.pdf , 01/08/2014
Nokkala, T. 2007: Network building, motivation and learning
in inter-organisational R&D collaboration projects. Theoretical considerations. – NEMO Working Paper 4. – Guildford. – Online available at: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/1571/1/fulltext.pdf, 30/07/2014
Pohoryles, R.J. 2002: The making of the European research area – a view from research networks. – Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 15 (4): 325-340
Porter, M.E. 2000: Location, competition and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. – Economic
Development Quarterly 14 (1): 15-34
Porter, A.L. and J. Youtie 2009: How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? – Journal of Nanoparticle Research 11 (5): 1023-1041
Roco, M.C. 2003: Nanotechnology: convergence with modern biology and medicine. – Current Opinion in Biotechnology 14 (3): 337-346
Roco, M.C. and W.S. Bainbridge 2005: Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Maximizing human benefit. – Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7 (1): 1-13
Roediger-Schluga, T. and M.J. Barber 2006: The structure of R&D collaboration networks in the European Framework Programmes. – UNU-MERIT Working Paper 2006-36. – Maastricht. – Online available at: http://arno.unimaas.nl/show.cgi?fid=6621, 30/07/2014
Roediger-Schluga, T. and M.J. Barber 2007: R&D collaboration networks in the European Framework Programmes: Data processing, network construction and selected results. – UNU-MERIT Working Paper 2007-032. – Maastricht. – Online available at: http://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/wppdf/2007/wp2007-032.pdf, 30/07/2014
Scherngell, T. and M.J. Barber 2010: Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: evidence from the fifth EU Framework Programme. – The Annals of Regional Science 46 (2): 247-266
Scott, J. 1991: Social network analysis. A handbook. – London
Silvani, A. 2010: La ricerca europea ed il Programma Quadro. – In: Sirilli, G. (ed.): La produzione e la diffusione della conoscenza. Ricerca, innovazione e risorse umane. – Roma
Torre, A. 2008: On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission. – Regional Studies 42 (6): 869-889
Trigilia, C. 2008: La costruzione sociale dell’innovazione. – Firenze
Uotila, T., V. Harmaakorpi and H. Melkas 2006: A method for assessing absorptive capacity of a regional innovation system. – Fennia 184 (1): 49-58
Uyarra, E. 2010: What is evolutionary about ‘regional systems of innovation’? Implications for regional policy. – Journal of Evolutionary Economics 20 (1): 115-137
Uzzi, B. 1997: Social structure and competition in interfirm
networks: the paradox of embeddedness. – Administrative
Science Quarterly 42 (1): 35-67
Wasserman, S. and K. Faust 1994: Social network analysis: methods and application. – Structural analysis in the social sciences 8. – Cambridge
Wagner, C. and L. Leydesdorff 2005: Network structure, selforganization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. – Research Policy 34 (10): 1608-1618
Wired and Cotec 2009: La cultura dell’innovazione in Italia. Rapporto 2009. – Milano
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
